TAM Report / Ukraine - Quality Assurance

Default profile image
Petya Mitova • 16 December 2025

GENERAL INFORMATION

TAM title: Quality assurance of teaching and learning in emergency and crisis situations

Type of Event: Webinar

Modality: Online

Country: Ukraine

Dates: 15 – 16 July 2025

Participants: The online TAM gathered around 130 participants, mainly teachers, researchers, ministry representatives, HEREs, and a representative of the national quality assurance agency, reflecting wide engagement from across Ukraine’s higher education system.

              

THEMES COVERED

  • Key concepts and tools of quality assurance
  • European Higher Education Area (EHEA) QA framework
  • Adapting QA systems to emergency, crisis, and wartime conditions
  • QA mechanisms to support teaching and learning during disruption
  • Examples from other countries recovering from conflict
  • Strategies for institutional improvement and remedial action
  • Peer-learning and co-creation of good practices toolbox

 

KEY OUTCOMES

During the workshop, participants:

  • Learned how to adapt QA tools and evaluation mechanisms to wartime realities.
  • Reviewed international examples of QA responses to crisis and post-war reconstruction.
  • Collaboratively created a toolbox of good practices for enhancing teaching and learning under emergency conditions.
  • Engaged in peer exchange, sharing institutional experiences and proposing potential improvements.
  • Strengthened awareness of strategic approaches to rebuilding and improving QA systems under constrained conditions.

OVERVIEW

This two-day online TAM focused on quality assurance of teaching and learning in emergency and crisis situations, addressing the urgent needs of Ukrainian higher education during wartime. The expert delivered sessions on the fundamentals of quality assurance, the European framework, and how traditional QA mechanisms can be adapted to crisis conditions. The programme combined presentations, roundtable discussions with Ukrainian HEREs, real-case examples from countries that have faced conflict, and a peer-learning workshop in which participants contributed examples of QA practices and collaboratively built a toolbox of good practices for crisis contexts.

Interactive surveys before and after the training showed a clear increase in participants’ confidence in understanding QA concepts, adapting QA tools to emergency situations, developing evaluation instruments, and designing strategies to improve teaching and learning in crisis-affected institutions.

 

ENHANCING IMPACT: PROPOSED NEXT STEPS

  • Continue developing and refining the toolbox of good practices, and support participants in implementing one selected practice in their institution.
  • Increase the quality assurance of online learning, which has become essential during the war.
  • Integrate micro-credentials into the national qualification framework to support upskilling and reskilling needs in wartime and reconstruction.
  • Shift gradually toward an institutional approach in external QA to enhance university autonomy and maturity.
  • Support ongoing national pilots on institutional accreditation (e.g., NAQA–HAKA initiative).
  • Strengthen Ukraine’s involvement in the EHEA by ensuring NAQA participates in the Bologna Thematic Peer Group on QA.

 

RESOURCES AND BACKGROUND MATERIAL

Be the first one to comment


Please log in or sign up to comment.